From Justified Emotions to Justified Evaluative Judgements
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Justified Beliefs by Justified Arguments
The paper addresses how the information state of an agent relates to the arguments that the agent endorses. Information states are modeled in doxastic logic and arguments by recasting abstract argumentation theory in a modal logic format. The two perspectives are combined by an application of the theory of product logics, delivering sound and complete systems in which the interaction of argumen...
متن کاملJustified inference
In this essay, I shall propose a general conception of the kind of inference that counts as justified or rational. This conception involves a version of the idea that justified belief is “closed” under competent inference—that is, roughly, whenever one competently infers a conclusion from a set of premises each of which one justifiedly believes, this inference always puts one in a position to h...
متن کاملProportional Justified Representation
The goal of multi-winner elections is to choose a fixed-size committee based on voters’ preferences. An important concern in this setting is representation: large groups of voters with cohesive preferences should be adequately represented by the election winners. Recently, Aziz et al. (2015a; 2017) proposed two axioms that aim to capture this idea: justified representation (JR) and its strength...
متن کاملNecessity as justified truth
We present a logic for the reasoning about necessity and justifications which is independent from relational semantics. We choose the concept of justification – coming from a class of Justification Logics (Artemov 2008, Fitting 2009) – as the primitive notion on which the concept of necessity is based. Our axiomatization extends Suszko’s non-Fregean logic SCI (Brown, Suszko 1972) by basic axiom...
متن کاملJustified Belief and Rationality
Brandenburger and Dekel have shown that common belief of rationality (CBR) characterizes rationalizable strategies, which are also characterized by a refinement of subjective correlated equilibrium called a posteriori equilibrium. It is possible that players’ beliefs might be incompatible, in the sense that player i can assign probability 1 to an event E to which player j assigns probability 0....
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Dialogue
سال: 2012
ISSN: 0012-2173,1759-0949
DOI: 10.1017/s0012217312000236